Many people use animal suffering as an argument to demand the release of these beings. Well, concerning this I guess once an animal in its natural environment with predators, risking their lives. Altira I realize that the argument of suffering does not have much weight when analyzing the current state of animal slavery. Clearly, we can not deny that animals suffer a lot, but this is not my reason to fight for the abolition of slavery in general.
My argument is the treatment of properties that are given the fact that people see the existence of other species for their own welfare, without thinking of the interests they may have, without being empathetic and realistic about the existence of beings who should have the same right to live in freedom that our species.
latter brings me to another point that is also interesting in relation to people "sensosentristas." A friend raised the issue on the people consent to the ability to feel that animals have in general, speak to the suffering of animals, our lesser brethren here and there, poor little animals, etc. "But, it was to the" but "some of them forget that humans we are also animals, sorry, we have interests and guess what WE ALSO EXPLOITED!
As operators are human, they come and put us all in a garbage bag and put the interests of other species on our own. Because we as a species are "bad" and animals are "good." Regarding the latter, could open a third item on the "moral", but I think that is too large to publish this note.
Returning to the theme of suffering, I think the time is not enough to do everything we want (conveniently for those who would suffer if we take the upper hand.) But thinking is free and we can do in place that we are, so it must begin to question the language we use to defend our ideas, information and performance tables should be more clear about what we pointed out, because if we are not, we would be falling at a rate misleading advertising, so all we need to give us daily media and advertising campaigns as we want to sell our ointment, our hidden message. No one is ultra vegan, super NOW, THEREFORE, but the same is because our current situation is not very different from non-human animals.
My argument is the treatment of properties that are given the fact that people see the existence of other species for their own welfare, without thinking of the interests they may have, without being empathetic and realistic about the existence of beings who should have the same right to live in freedom that our species.
latter brings me to another point that is also interesting in relation to people "sensosentristas." A friend raised the issue on the people consent to the ability to feel that animals have in general, speak to the suffering of animals, our lesser brethren here and there, poor little animals, etc. "But, it was to the" but "some of them forget that humans we are also animals, sorry, we have interests and guess what WE ALSO EXPLOITED!
As operators are human, they come and put us all in a garbage bag and put the interests of other species on our own. Because we as a species are "bad" and animals are "good." Regarding the latter, could open a third item on the "moral", but I think that is too large to publish this note.
Returning to the theme of suffering, I think the time is not enough to do everything we want (conveniently for those who would suffer if we take the upper hand.) But thinking is free and we can do in place that we are, so it must begin to question the language we use to defend our ideas, information and performance tables should be more clear about what we pointed out, because if we are not, we would be falling at a rate misleading advertising, so all we need to give us daily media and advertising campaigns as we want to sell our ointment, our hidden message. No one is ultra vegan, super NOW, THEREFORE, but the same is because our current situation is not very different from non-human animals.
LIBER ATION TOTAL!
written by R. beet
0 comments:
Post a Comment